RSS
Living Together
- Civility & Rhetoric (53) : Discourse, Persuasion, Respect
- Activism & Revolt (16) : Making Change
- Family (1) : The Family
- Government, Law, Politics (57)
- War & Peace (31) : War & Peacemaking
- Journalism (10) : All that's fit to print
- Education (15) : Scholarship and Pedagogy
- History (11) : History and Method
- In/Tolerance (20) : Living With Differences
- Church & State (37) : God & Country
Eugenics and Other Evils, by G.K. Chesterton (Cassell : 1922), p.76-77.
The thing that really is trying to tyrannise through government is
Science. The thing that really does use the secular arm is Science. And
the creed that really is levying tithes and capturing schools, the
creed that really is enforced by fine and imprisonment, the creed that
really is proclaimed not in sermons but in statutes, and spread not by
pilgrims but by policemen — that creed is the great but disputed system
of thought which began with Evolution and has ended in Eugenics.
Materialism is really our established Church; for the Government will
really help it to persecute its heretics. Vaccination, in its hundred
years of experiment, has been disputed almost as much as baptism in its
approximate two thousand. But it seems quite natural to our politicians
to enforce vaccination; and it would seem to them madness to enforce
baptism.
An extract from the diary of Lieutenant Colonel Mervin Willett Gonin DSO who was among the first British soldiers to liberate Bergen-Belsen in 1945. Source: Imperial War museum. Cited at Banksy.
I can give no adequate description of the Horror Camp in which my men
and myself were to spend the next month of our lives. It was just a
barren wilderness, as bare as a chicken run. Corpses lay everywhere,
some in huge piles, sometimes they lay singly or in pairs where they
had fallen. It took a little time to get used to seeing men women and
children collapse as you walked by them and to restrain oneself from
going to their assistance. One had to get used early to the idea that
the individual just did not count. One knew that five hundred a day
were dying and that five hundred a day were going on dying for weeks
before anything we could do would have the slightest effect. It was,
however, not easy to watch a child choking to death from diptheria when
you knew a tracheotomy and nursing would save it, one saw women
drowning in their own vomit because they were too weak to turn over,
and men eating worms as they clutched a half loaf of bread purely
because they had to eat worms to live and now could scarcely tell the
difference. Piles of corpses, naked and obscene, with a woman too weak
to stand propping herself against them as she cooked the food we had
given her over an open fire; men and women crouching down just anywhere
in the open relieving themselves of the dysentary which was scouring
their bowels, a woman standing stark naked washing herself with some
issue soap in water from a tank in which the remains of a child
floated. It was shortly after the British Red Cross arrived, though it
may have no connection, that a very large quantity of lipstick arrived.
This was not at all what we men wanted, we were screaming for hundreds
and thousands of other things and I don't know who asked for lipstick.
I wish so much that I could discover who did it, it was the action of
genius, sheer unadulterated brilliance. I believe nothing did more for
these internees than the lipstick. Women lay in bed with no sheets and
no nightie but with scarlet red lips, you saw them wandering about with
nothing but a blanket over their shoulders, but with scarlet red lips.
I saw a woman dead on the post mortem table and clutched in her hand
was a piece of lipstick. At last someone had done something to make
them individuals again, they were someone, no longer merely the number
tatooed on the arm. At last they could take an interest in their
appearance. That lipstick started to give them back their humanity.
C.S. Lewis on Newspapers said...
Surprised by Joy (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: 1955), 159.
Even in peacetime I think those are very wrong who say that schoolboys
should be encouraged to read the newspapers. Nearly all that a boy
reads there in his teens will be seen before he is twenty to have been
false in emphasis and interpretation, if not in fact as well, and most
of it will have lost all importance. Most of what he remembers he will
therefore have to unlearn; and he will probably have acquired an
incurable taste for vulgarity and sensationalism and the fatal habit of
fluttering from paragraph to paragraph to learn how an actress has been
divorced in California, a train derailed in France, and quadruplets
born in New Zealand.
C.S. Lewis on Loving Books said...
Surprised by Joy (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: 1955), 164.
One other thing that Arthur taught me was to love the bodies of books.
I had always respected them. My brother and I might cut up a stepladder
without scruple; to have thumb-marked or dog's-eared a book would have
filled us with shame. But Arthur did not merely respect, he was
enamored; and soon, I too. The set up of the page, the feel and smell
of the paper, the differing sounds that different papers make as you
turn the leaves, became sensuous delights. This revealed to me a flaw
in Kirk. How often have I shuddered when he took a new classical text
of mine in his gardener's hands, bent back the boards till they
creaked, and left his sign on every page.
G.K. Chesterton on Tradition said...
Tradition is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to
the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be
walking about.
Oscar Wilde on War said...
As long as war is regarded as wicked, it will always have its
fascination. When it is looked upon as vulgar, it will cease to be
popular.
Arthur Koestler on War said...
War is a ritual, a deadly ritual, not the result of aggressive
self-assertion, but of self-transcending identification. Without
loyalty to tribe, church, flag or ideal, there would be no wars.
John Stuart Mill on War said...
War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and
degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that
nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he
is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own
personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being
free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than
himself.
From a speech given in Paris at the Sorbonne in 1910
It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the
strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done them
better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena;
whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives
valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the
great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy
cause; who, at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high
achievement; and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while
daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and
timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
Article 18, Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion;
this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and
freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or
private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice,
worship and observance.
God in the Dock (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1970)
Others may protest that intellecutal discussion can neither build
Christianity nor destroy it. They may feel that religion is too sacred
to be thus bandied to and fro in public debate, too sacred to be talked
of — almost, perhaps, too sacred for anything to be done with it at
all. Clearly, the Christian members of the Society (Oxford Socratic
Club) think differently. They know that intellectual assent is not
faith, but they do not believe that religion is only 'what a man does
with his solitude'. Or if it is, then they care nothing for 'religion'
and all for Christianity. Christianity is not merely what a man does
with his solitude. It is not even what God does with His solitude. It
tells of God descending into the coarse publicity of history and there
enacting what can — and must — be talked about.
Popular in Books
- Boston College's MA Philosophy Reading List
- How People Poison Everything
- Librarians' Top 100 Novels of 20th Century
- What's So Great About Christianity
- Faith of the Fatherless
- Oxford Handbook of Skepticism
- The Persecuted Atheist?
- Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics
- The Victory of Reason
- What Is a "Scientific Fact"? Won't Plain Ol' Facts Do?
Popular in Quotes
- Lt. Col. Mervin Willett Gonin DSO on the Holocaust
- Friedrich Nietzsche on Fighting Monsters
- Fyodor Dostoevsky (as Ivan Karamazov) on Evil
- Karl Marx on Religion
- J.P. Moreland on Postmodernism and Anger
- Mark Twain (as Huck Finn) on Ethics
- John Stuart Mill on Fallibility and Free Speech
- J.P. Moreland on Postmodernism
- Angus Menuge on Inference to the Best Explanation
- J.P. Moreland on Rival Worldviews
Popular in Papers
- The Euthanasia Debate: Understanding the Issues
- Aquinas versus Locke and Descartes on the Human Person and End-of-Life Ethics
- Utilitarianism and the Moral Life
- Philosophical Apologetics, the Church, and Contemporary Culture
- Scientific Creationism, Science, and Conceptual Problems
- Is Science a Threat or Help to Faith?
- Argument from Consciousness
- Complementarity, Agency Theory, and the God-of-the-Gaps
- Scientific Naturalism and the Unfalsifiable Myth of Evolution
- The Indispensability of Theological Meta-ethical Foundations for Morality
