There is an unacknowledged creation story that is at the root of all secular learning which is the precise opposite of John 1:1 in every ... » Go

In this I tend to share the concern of Richard Lewontin, who wrote in the New York Review of Books: "Who am I to believe ... » Go

[T]he logic of materialist reductionism implies that science itself is the product of unreasoning material causes. No wonder the Age of Reason ends with the ... » Go

By any realistic definition naturalism is a religion, and an extremely dogmatic one. It rests on a basic conviction about ultimate reality that is held ... » Go

In the final analysis, it is not any specific scientific evidence that convinces me that Darwinism is a pseudoscience that will collapse once it becomes ... » Go

When Darwinists are worried about popular revolt, they tell the Darwinian story with a mildly theistic spin. They realize that it is safer to allow ... » Go

The logic implies that it may be only natural for robot vehicles [us] to murder, rob, rape or enslave other robots to satisfy their genetic ... » Go

Darwinists can take in stride any debates over the particulars of their theory, however strident, so long as the underlying principle of naturalistic explanation is ... » Go

We all like to believe we are more rational than we really are. The painful truth is that we are naturally inclined to believe what ... » Go

[I]ntelligent design theorists need to explain why the vast majority of evolutionary scientists refuse to consider evidence of intelligent design in biology, scornfully dismissing the ... » Go

The creation-evolution controversy is one of those subjects that has become standardized in the press. I sometimes have the impression that journalists just click on ... » Go

It is not surprising that in a country where the vast majority of citizens believe in God, it is controversial to require that the public ... » Go

What educators in Kansas and elsewhere should be doing is to “teach the controversy.” Of course students should learn the orthodox Darwinian theory and the ... » Go

Probably the best way to explain why some theistic modernists are enthusiastic not only about evolution but specifically about unguided evolution is to start with ... » Go

Philosophical naturalism is not merely a gratuitous conclusion that neo-Darwinists draw from their scientific theory; rather, it is the powerful metaphysical basis of the theory ... » Go

If the matter were considered open to question, there would be plenty of reason to doubt that natural selection has the vast creative powers Darwinists ... » Go

Darwinists took the wrong view of science because they were infected with the craving to be right. Their scientific colleagues have allowed them to get ... » Go

Darwinist scientists believe that the cosmos is a closed system of material causes and effects, and they believe that science must be able to provide ... » Go