RSS
Books & Bibliography and Biblically Inspired Ethics
Paul K. Moser, ed. (Cambridge University Press: Oct 20, 2008), 248 pages.
What, if anything, does Jesus of Nazareth have to do with philosophy?
This question motivates this collection of new essays from leading
theologians, philosophers, and biblical scholars. Part I portrays Jesus
in his first-century intellectual and historical context, attending to
intellectual influences and contributions and contemporaneous similar
patterns of thought. Part II examines how Jesus influenced two of the
most prominent medieval philosophers. It considers the seeming
conceptual shift from Hebraic categories of thought to distinctively
Greco-Roman ones in later Christian philosophers. Part III considers
the significance of Jesus for some prominent contemporary philosophical
topics, including epistemology and the meaning of life. The focus is
not so much on how "Christianity" figures in such topics as on how
Jesus makes distinctive contributions to such topics. ~ Product Description
Arthur F. Holmes, 2nd edition (IVP Academic: Jan, 2008), 150 pages.
With over 60,000 copies in print since its original publication in
1984, Ethics has served numerous generations of students as a classic
introduction to philosophical ethics from a Christian perspective. Over
the years the philosophical landscape has changed somewhat, and in this
new edition Arthur Holmes adjusts the argument and information
throughout, completely rewriting the earlier chapter on virtue ethics
and adding a new chapter on the moral agent. The book addresses the
questions: What is good? What is right? How can we know? In doing so it
also surveys a variety of approaches to ethics, including cultural
relativism, emotivism, ethical egoism and utilitarianism all with an
acknowledgment of the new postmodern environment. Features: 1) Introduces various ethical systems, 2) Contrasts a Christian ethic with other ethical systems, 3) Deals with contemporary moral dilemmas, 4) Includes a new chapter on the moral agent, 5) Features adjusted and updated arguments and information to reflect the current philosophical landscape.
Richard B. Hays (Harper San Francisco: September 1996), 528 pages.
This is an amazing book — solid scholarship and well thought-out
interpretation delivered with a sense of urgency and sincerity. If you
are at all interested in Ethics or the state of New Testament
scholarship, this book is an absolute necessity. Hays
sees distinct (though overlapping) tasks in the process of "doing
ethics" and is able to explain and apply them clearly. His emphasis on
seeing ethical questions through the "focal lenses" of Cross, Community
and New Creation is a wonderful guidepost for anyone concerned with
faithful, Spirit-driven scholarship. He stresses that an "integrative
act of the imagination" is required to be able to apply the Scripture
to our world and suggests methods for achieving it. Hays analyzes five theologian/ethicists in light of his approach (including Barth,
Hauerwas, and Schussler-Fiorenza) and, in doing so, further clarifies
how his approach can be used by others. The final section of the
book applies Hays' approach to contemporary issues. Partly because of
his obvious authority in Greek and New Testament scholarship, and
partly because of his honest, passionate approach, his conclusions are
bold and very persuasive.
Peter Kreeft (Servant Publications: May, 1990), 218 pages.
Peter Kreeft has written a great little book for all those who are
tired of hearing 'it's not so black and white'. Kreeft does an
excellent job of explaining, simply and clearly, that right and wrong
are objective - regardless of whether or not it is easy or makes
someone happy. Kreeft also clears up some moral misconceptions like 'if
it doesn't hurt anyone else, then it's ok' and 'the end justifies the
means'. Also included in this book is an excellent discussion,
scientifically based, on why abortion is objectively wrong (such as the
fact that science has always defined a fetus as another human life,
science has never been able to come up with a concrete time limit on
so-called viability, and that a fetus has a distinct human genetic code
that is separate from it's mother's). While
in reading this book Kreeft does spend some time talking about God and
his Christian faith, his arguments are philosophically and
scientifically sound across the religious spectrum. Regardless of a
reader's religion/athiesm, Kreeft's logic applies. While Kreeft argues
that morality comes from God, he also demonstrates that one need not
know that or believe in God to understand and use objective morals. ~ Tammy L. Schilling
