- Civility & Rhetoric (18) : Discourse, Persuasion, Respect
- Activism & Revolt (1) : Making Change
- Government, Law, Politics (9)
- War & Peace (4) : War & Peacemaking
- Journalism (1) : All that's fit to print
- Education (4) : Scholarship and Pedagogy
- History (2) : History and Method
- In/Tolerance (4) : Living With Differences
- Church & State (7) : God & Country
Richard J. Mouw (Intervarsity: Jul 1992), 173 pages.
Richard Mouw wrote this short and simple book a dozen years ago, but it is, perhaps, even more timely today than when it first appeared. The last several presidential elections indicate that our country and our churches are badly divided over a broad range of important issues like gay rights, abortion, stem cell research, the place of America in the world, global economics, health care, and the list goes on. Many people employ a military metaphor to describe our so-called "culture wars." In a war, to state the obvious, you have friends and foes, enemies and allies, the goal being for Good (that would be "our" side) to defeat Evil ("their" side). Sharp, partisan and demonizing rhetoric about these issues divides us even further. One is left to exasperate with Rodney King, "why can't we all just get along?" Mouw shows how and why Christians should not only be people of conviction, but people of compassion and civility. We are, he reminds us, to "pursue peace with everyone" (Hebrews 12:14), and to "show every courtesy to everyone" (Titus 3:2). Civility does not mean we have to like everyone we meet or forfeit our convictions to a relativistic perspective. Rather, it means caring deeply about our civitas and its public life. After defining the nature and parameters of Christian civility, Mouw investigates its implications for our speech, attitudes, pluralistic society, sexual mores, other religions, and leadership in a fallen world. He explores the limits of civility, when there is no "on the other hand." In his final two chapters he cautions against our tendencies to triumphalism, and trying to usher in the kingdom of God right now, as opposed to appreciating the ways and means of a patient, slow-moving God who loves His creation deeply and longs to redeem it. ~ Daniel B. Clendenin
Thomas More (Penguin Group: May 2003), 176 pages.
Sixteenth-century classic by English ecclesiastic and scholar envisioned a tolerant, patriarchal island kingdom free of private property, violence, bloodshed and vice. Forerunner of many later attempts. Since its publication in 1516, Utopia has provoked a hailstorm of debate. The minute details More ascribed to his "perfect world" make Utopia still a work of the future. • "There were utopias before this book that Thomas More wrote in the early 1500s, including Plato's Republic. This, however, is the book that gives us the word 'Utopia.' The book is brief, barely over 100 pages, and only 60-some describe the place itself. That is enough, and makes me nostalgic for the habit of writing briefly and to the point. It's easy to sum up More's heaven-on-earth in a few words. It portrays a communal, democratic society. It is paradoxically unregulated and tightly regulated — overwhelmingly, More's citizens just want to do what is best for their society, and that covers a remarkably narrow range of possibilities. There are, of course, some who break the laws of the land, and More deals with them harshly. "Harsh" is a relative term, though, and his punishments were hardly harsh in a day when it was a hanging offense to steal a loaf of bread for your starving family. It's also a strongly religious society. Religious tolerance is a matter of law, a novelty by the standards of More's day and the standard of his own behavior. 'Tolerance', however, meant tolerance of any monotheism that wasn't too animistic, and certainly didn't tolerate the unreligious. This translation from More's original Latin is modern and smoothly readable. Even so, I wonder how another translator would have handled some of More's neologistic names, like the unpleasant 'Venalians' who are the Utopians' neighbors. No answer is right, but other renderings may convey more and grate less. Those are quibbles, though. It's a good book as well as being a Great Book, and casts an interesting shadow into modern communism, theocracy, and ideas of the good life. I recommend it highly." ~ wiredweird at Amazon.com
Popular in Books
- Boston College's MA Philosophy Reading List
- How People Poison Everything
- Librarians' Top 100 Novels of 20th Century
- What's So Great About Christianity
- Faith of the Fatherless
- Oxford Handbook of Skepticism
- The Persecuted Atheist?
- Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics
- The Victory of Reason
- What Is a "Scientific Fact"? Won't Plain Ol' Facts Do?
- Rhetoric or Reason
- Love Your God With All Your Mind
- Is Goodness without God Good Enough?
- Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview
- Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology
- The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology
- The God Question
- Image Journal's Top 100 Books of the Century
- Scaling the Secular City
- Michael L. Peterson
- The Hiddenness of God
- The Universe Next Door
- The Recalcitrant Imago Dei
- How to Criticize Religion
- The Abortion Controversy
- The Decade of Atheism?
- Does God Exist?
- God is not Great
- God and the Philosophers
- Intelligent Discussion of Intelligent Design
- The God Conversation
- Philosophy of Religion
- The Creative Call
- Philosophers without Gods
- Who Moved the Stone?
- The Reason for God
- The Case for Faith
- Alvin Plantinga
- God's Universe
- The Cambridge Companion to Atheism
- The Devil's Delusion
- Living at the Crossroads
- Jesus and Philosophy
- The Sacred Gaze
- Visual Faith
- Creative Spirituality
- The Jesus Legend
- The Rock That Is Higher
- The Big Book of Bible Difficulties