Request new password

The Illogic Primer is an adapted version of Stephen Downes' excellent catalog of logical fallacies. A good grasp of these all too common rhetorical devices and logical errors is indispensable in improving one's own thinking and seeing the faulty reasoning in bad arguments. The Illogic Primer is still in development, but is marginally useful in its current form.
<sic> means "quoted verbatim". In other words, <sic> is a searchable quotes database. Like the general themes of Afterall.net, <sic> quotes deal with subjects of philosophy, culture, and religion. We have also done our best to provide lengthier quotes instead of pithy sayings — for context — and to include bibliographical details so that quotes can be cited in your own writing. At last count, <sic> includes about 600 quotes.
Clippings is Afterall.net's Web log. Here we point to noteworthy articles found on the web and crosslink to related articles for the sake of a balanced look at the subject in question.
Paper Trails is Afterall.net's collection of articles and essays by philosophers and thinkers.
Re|Search is Afterall.net's search engine. But in addition to searching this site, by clicking on the "Re|Search Engine", you will find the Re|Search Engine itself, a helpul tool that enables you to search a number of online resources from one page.
Is God Good? 
Clipped by Nathan Jacobson (Jun 17, 2007)
A number of recent books making the case against God have hit the best-seller list, most notably Christopher Hitchens' God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything and Richard Dawkins' The God Delusion. If you follow the argument closely, you'll notice that the gravamen of the case against God is their judgment that God, and specifically the Christian God, as he is commonly understood, is not good after all. Now, it is not clear how even if God is an unlikable sort that this precludes his existence or the existence of some other unknown God. Nonetheless, this line of reasoning usually pops up in arguments against theism (cf. the arguments linked in "Does God Exist?"). And, whatever its status as a logical proof against theism, it is existentially forceful because we meet a God in their arguments that is deserving of their unmistakable disdain. The argument against the goodness of God usually advances on three fronts: 1) God cannot be good because the world is rife with evil and suffering; 2) The God we meet in the Bible, especially in the Hebrew Bible or Old Testament, is repugnant to our moral sensibilities; and, 3) Those who claim to follow this God are responsible for epic evils like the Inquisition, the Crusades, and the "troubles" in Northern Ireland as well as for more quotidian evils like intolerance, anti-intellectualism, and being bores. While I take Hitchens' and Dawkins' painfully unbalanced tirades to be unhelpful, the basic thrust of their arguments should be, and is in fact, troubling to believers. LeaderU.com has collected a number of articles wrestling with the first question. Marilyn McCord Adams' well regarded, Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God also deals honestly and poignantly with this difficult question at greater length. The second concern about the biblical God is largely a theological question. The attributes of God, including the Goodness of God, are enumerated without much in the way of soul-searching at Grace's Online Library and at The Christian Courier. As for the third contention, Robert Royal's, The God That Did Not Fail: How Religion Built and Sustains the West and James Kennedy's What if Jesus Had Never Been Born consider the impact of Christianity on history. Finally, Christianity Today is featuring a conversation between Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson regarding Hitchens' accusations against God and religion. It is truly a clash of the Titans.