Search Afterall.net

 
Search  All Papers Clippings Illogic Books Quotes

Register new account

Request new password

Translate this Page
Define a Word
Close Translator

Translator

  • Nederlands
  • Français
  • Português
  • Español
  • Deutsch
  • 한국어
  • 中文 (简体)
  • Русский
 
RSS
What and How We Know and Religion Under the Lens
All > Categories > Epistemology (29)
All > Categories > Religion (14)
Any of these categories
 
Jeffrey Satinover on Religious Certitude said...
What Can We Reasonably Hope For? A Millennium Symposium. First Things 99 (Januray 2000): 31-33
I suppose that God Himself is doing just fine, but His earthly defenders are on the ropes, and it's our own fault. Religion deservedly comes in for more criticism in its failures than does science, because genuine religion claims for itself the ability to know what's true, whereas genuine science claims for itself only the ability to quantify the probability of a thing being wrong. (Bad science and bad religion simply swap roles, the former proclaiming Truth, the latter worshiping Doubt.) Religion's bête noire is the fact that a genuine truth arrogantly asserted — that is, without so much as a moment's consideration that it might be false — is a most pernicious kind of falsehood, far worse in its effects on the humane than a flat mistake. It's a matter of modesty. It never uses the term, but science itself is a method to insure modesty of claims (however arrogant its practitioners). Religion, on the other hand, speaks constantly of the virtues, and then, on the whole, displays them with no greater consistency than does any other human institution.
 
About Afterall.net Contact Afterall.net

Browse in Articles

  • Categories (1138)
    • Metaphysics (30)
    • Epistemology (61)
    • Aesthetics (18)
    • Being Human (102)
    • Christianity (84)
    • Ethics (98)
    • Faith and Reason (135)
    • Jesus (54)
    • Origins & Science (150)
    • Religion (62)
    • Skepticism (36)
    • Society & Culture (81)
    • A/Theism (99)
    • Truth (18)
    • Worldviews (110)

Popular in Books

  • Rhetoric or Reason
  • How People Poison Everything
  • Is Goodness without God Good Enough?
  • Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics
  • What Is a "Scientific Fact"? Won't Plain Ol' Facts Do?
  • There Is a God
  • The Victory of Reason
  • The Persecuted Atheist?
  • Missing the Point
  • The Jesus Legend

Popular in Quotes

  • Lt. Col. Mervin Willett Gonin DSO on the Holocaust
  • Thomas Reid on Knowing Thyself
  • Bill Maher on Religious Certitude
  • Stephen Jay Gould on Scientific Presuppositions
  • J.P. Moreland on Rival Worldviews
  • Edward R. Murrow on Truth
  • Camilla Paglia on Art
  • Pope Benedict XVI on the Meaning of Evolve
  • J.P. Moreland on Postmodernism and Anger
  • Angus Menuge on Inference to the Best Explanation

Popular in Papers

  • Philosophical Apologetics, the Church, and Contemporary Culture
  • Is Science a Threat or Help to Faith?
  • Aquinas versus Locke and Descartes on the Human Person and End-of-Life Ethics
  • Complementarity, Agency Theory, and the God-of-the-Gaps
  • The Euthanasia Debate: Understanding the Issues
  • Argument from Consciousness
  • Naturalism and Libertarian Agency
  • What Is Naturalism that We Should Be Mindful of It?
  • The Experiential Basis of Theism
  • Miracles and Justified Belief: Further Clarification

Random

  • The Center for Philosophy of Religion at Notre Dame
  • S. Lovtrup on Incipient Stages
  • Evil and the Evidence for God:
    The Challenge of John Hick's Theodicy
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Nancy R. Pearcey and Charles B. Thaxton
  • David Foster Wallace on Talk Radio
  • Francis A. Schaeffer on the Jesus of History
  • Edward R. Murrow on Politicians
  • Robert Anton Wilson on Being Human
  • Two Dozen (or so) Theistic Arguments