RSS
Noetic Dissonance
The Divine Conspiracy (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1998), p. 328.
We [must] listen carefully to those we teach. We encourage every
question, and we make it clear that dealing honestly with questions
that come up is the only path to a robust and healthy faith. We will
never "pooh-pooh" difficulties, or take any problem with anything less
than utter seriousness, or direct the slightest reproach or shame on
anyone for having questions and doubts. When we don't honestly know
what to say at the time, we will just say so. We will go away and find
an answer through study, conversation, and prayer.
Love God With All Your Mind (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1997), p. 107.
It is unproductive to try to believe something beyond your grounds for believing it and dishonest to act as if you believe something more strongly than you do. Overbelief is not a virtue. For example, I am far from certain on many Christian beliefs I hold. I lean toward the view that the days of Genesis are vast periods of time and not literal twenty-four-hour periods. But about two days of the week I flip-flop and accept the literal view. Based on my study, I cannot convince myself either way... Other beliefs of mine have grown in certainty over the years — that God really exists, for example. We should be honest with ourselves about the strength of our various beliefs and work on strengthening them by considering the issues relevant to their acceptance.
The Second Meditation
Yesterday's meditation has thrown me into such doubts that I can no
longer ignore them, yet I fail to see how they are to be resolved. It
is as if I had suddenly fallen into a deep whirlpool; I am so tossed
about that I can neither touch bottom with my foot, nor swim up to the
top.
The Philosophical Works of Descartes, ed., tr. Elizabeth S. Haldane and GRT Ross (New York: Dover, 1955), p. 144
It is now some years since I detected how many are the false beliefs
that I had from my earliest youth admitted as true, and how doubtful
was everything I had since constructed on this basis, and from that
time I was convinced that I must once for all seriously undertake to
rid myself of all the opinions which I formerly accepted, and commence
to build anew from the foundation...
Mere Christianity (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996 [first published 1943]), p.127
We have to be continually reminded of what we believe. Neither this
belief nor any other will automatically remain alive in the mind. It
must be fed. And as a matter of fact, if you examined a hundred people
who had lost their faith in Christianity, I wonder how many of them
would turn out to have been reasoned out of it by honest argument? Do
not most people simply drift away?
Mere Christianity (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996) p.124,125.
I am not asking anyone to accept Christianity if his best reasoning
tells him that the weight of the evidence is against it. That is not
the point at which Faith comes in. But supposing a man's reason once
decides that the weight of the evidence is for it. I can tell that man
what is going to happen to him in the next few weeks. There will come a
moment when there is bad news, or he is in trouble, or is living among
a lot of other people who do not believe it, and all at once his
emotions will rise up and carry out a sort of blitz on his belief...
Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art
of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your
changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes.
I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in
which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist
I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable.

