God's Universe
Owen Gingerich (Belknap Press : September 30, 2006)
In God’s Universe, Owen Gingerich, a Harvard University astronomer and
science historian, tells how in the 1980s he was part of an effort to
produce a kind of anti-Cosmos, a television series called Space, Time,
and God that was to counter Sagan’s "conspicuously materialist approach
to the universe." The program never got off the ground, but its premise
survives: that there are two ways to think about science. You can be a
theist, believing that behind the veil of randomness lurks an active,
loving, manipulative God, or you can be a materialist, for whom
everything is matter and energy interacting within space and time.
Whichever metaphysical club you belong to, the science comes out the
same. In the hands of as fine a writer as Gingerich, the idea almost
sounds convincing. "One can believe that some of the evolutionary
pathways are so intricate and so complex as to be hopelessly improbable
by the rules of random chance," he writes, "but if you do not believe
in divine action, then you will simply have to say that random chance
was extremely lucky, because the outcome is there to see. Either way,
the scientist with theistic metaphysics will approach laboratory
problems in much the same way as his atheistic colleague across the
hall." ~ Scientific American
Print
Astronomer Gingerich believes in a designed universe, although not in
intelligent design (ID), the antievolution theorizing that some
Evangelical Christian activists want taught in public-school science
courses. His intent isn't, however, to flay ID as Michael Shermer does
in Why Darwin Matters
(see review on p.22); it is to explore a few topics in science that
suggest design and a designer, God. He weighs the Copernican principle
that intelligent life isn't exceptional in the universe against the
Darwinian emphasis on the uniqueness of life on Earth. He probes the
differences between atheist and religious scientists (this is where he
dismisses ID along with "evolution as a materialist philosophy" as
ideologies), especially over the big bang and cosmological teleology.
Finally, he raises some "Questions without Answers" to point up the
different, irreconcilable concerns of physics as opposed to
metaphysics, science as opposed to religion. Utterly lacking scientific
or religious triumphalism, demonstrating why both ways of knowing are
indispensable, Gingerich's highly rereadable remarks may well outlast
all the brouhaha of the ID-evolution fracas. ~ Ray Olson for Booklist
Filed in...
All
> Categories
> Origins & Science
All > Categories > Origins & Science > Philosophy of Science
Any of these categories - All of these categories
All > Categories > Origins & Science > Philosophy of Science
Any of these categories - All of these categories



