Tim Folger on the Fine-Tuned Universe
"Science's Alternative to an Intelligent Creator: the Multiverse Theory", in Discover (Nov. 10, 2008).
A sublime cosmic mystery unfolds on a mild summer
afternoon in Palo Alto, California... The day seems ordinary enough.
Cyclists maneuver through traffic, and orange poppies bloom on dry
brown hills near Linde’s office on the Stanford University campus. But
everything here, right down to the photons lighting the scene after an
eight-minute jaunt from the sun, bears witness to an extraordinary fact
about the universe: Its basic properties are uncannily suited for life.
Tweak the laws of physics in just about any way and — in this universe,
anyway — life as we know it would not exist. ¶ Consider just two
possible changes. Atoms consist of protons, neutrons, and electrons. If
those protons were just 0.2 percent more massive than they actually
are, they would be unstable and would decay into simpler particles.
Atoms wouldn’t exist; neither would we. If gravity were slightly more
powerful, the consequences would be nearly as grave. A beefed-up
gravitational force would compress stars more tightly, making them
smaller, hotter, and denser. Rather than surviving for billions of
years, stars would burn through their fuel in a few million years,
sputtering out long before life had a chance to evolve. There are many
such examples of the universe’s life-friendly properties—so many, in
fact, that physicists can’t dismiss them all as mere accidents. ¶ Physicists don’t like coincidences. They like even less the notion that
life is somehow central to the universe, and yet recent discoveries are
forcing them to confront that very idea. Life, it seems, is not an
incidental component of the universe, burped up out of a random
chemical brew on a lonely planet to endure for a few fleeting ticks of
the cosmic clock. In some strange sense, it appears that we are not
adapted to the universe; the universe is adapted to us. ¶
Call it a fluke, a mystery, a miracle. Or call it the biggest problem
in physics. Short of invoking a benevolent creator, many physicists see
only one possible explanation: Our universe may be but one of perhaps
infinitely many universes in an inconceivably vast multi verse. Most of
those universes are barren, but some, like ours, have conditions
suitable for life.
Filed in...

Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Lest they devolve into the infantile comments on display at YouTube and elsewhere, comments require registration and are moderated, not for point of view but for quality. » Register or » Login