Craig Evans is a very well-respected New Testament scholar with a
background in historical studies. Although Fabricating Jesus includes
brief though able refutations of claims made by The Da Vinci Code, The
Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, The
Jesus Papers, and The Pagan Christ, the bulk of material addresses
popularized claims made by more reputable commentators, such as J.D.
Crossan, Bart Ehrman, James Robinson, the Jesus Seminar, and James
Tabor. Evans begins by discussing his own religious background and how it was
affected by the critical study of the New Testament and historical
Jesus. He uses this personal reflection to try and understand why some
respected scholars have embraced such far-fetched theories. One of his
explanations is that some of these scholars came from strict,
fundamentalist backgrounds. When exposed to the critical studies, they
were not flexible enough to accomodate the new information in their
existing religious mind set. As a result, their faith was shattered
instead of modified. They see little middle ground betweeen strict
fundamentalism and utter rejection of traditional positions. Evans
points to himself as evidence of a middle ground that actually bases
its opinions on better historical evidences. ~ C. Price at Amazon.com
Fabricating Jesus:
How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels
Craig A. Evans (IVP Books : December 6, 2006), 290 pages.
Craig Evans is a very well-respected New Testament scholar with a
background in historical studies. Although Fabricating Jesus includes
brief though able refutations of claims made by The Da Vinci Code, The
Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, The
Jesus Papers, and The Pagan Christ, the bulk of material addresses
popularized claims made by more reputable commentators, such as J.D.
Crossan, Bart Ehrman, James Robinson, the Jesus Seminar, and James
Tabor. Evans begins by discussing his own religious background and how it was
affected by the critical study of the New Testament and historical
Jesus. He uses this personal reflection to try and understand why some
respected scholars have embraced such far-fetched theories. One of his
explanations is that some of these scholars came from strict,
fundamentalist backgrounds. When exposed to the critical studies, they
were not flexible enough to accomodate the new information in their
existing religious mind set. As a result, their faith was shattered
instead of modified. They see little middle ground betweeen strict
fundamentalism and utter rejection of traditional positions. Evans
points to himself as evidence of a middle ground that actually bases
its opinions on better historical evidences. ~ C. Price at Amazon.comPrint

