Naturalism Defeated?
James K. Beilby, ed. (Cornell University Press: May 2002), 320 pages.Almost a decade ago, Alvin Plantinga articulated his bold and controversial evolutionary argument against naturalism. This intriguing line of argument raises issues of importance to epistemologists and to philosophers of mind, of religion, and of science. In this, the first book to address the ongoing debate, Plantinga presents his influential thesis and responds to critiques by distinguished philosophers from a variety of subfields. Plantinga’s argument is aimed at metaphysical naturalism or roughly the view that no supernatural beings exist. Naturalism is typically conjoined with evolution as an explanation of the existence and diversity of life. Plantinga’s claim is that one who holds to the truth of both naturalism and evolution is irrational in doing so. More specifically, because the probability that unguided evolution would have produced reliable cognitive faculties is either low or inscrutable, one who holds both naturalism and evolution acquires a "defeater" for every belief he/she holds, including the beliefs associated with naturalism and evolution. Following Plantinga’s brief summary of his thesis are eleven original pieces by his critics. The book concludes with a new essay by Plantinga in which he defends and extends his view that metaphysical naturalism is self-defeating. ~ Book Description
Table of Contents
-
- Preface
- Introduction: The Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism — Alvin Plantinga 1
- Part I Science and Evolution
- Naturalism Defended — William Ramsey 15
- Is Science Biologically Possible? — Jerry Fodor 30
- Darwin’s Doubt, Calvin’s Calvary — Evan Fales 43
- Part II Skepticism
- Commonsense Naturalism — Michael Bergmann 61
- Plantinga’s Evolutionary Meditations — Ernest Sosa 91
- Can Atheists Know Anything? — James Van Cleve 103
- Part III Conditional Probabilities and Confirmation Theory
- A House Divided against Itself Cannot Stand — Timothy O’Connor 129
- Conditional Probabilities in Plantinga’s Argument — Richard Otte 135
- The Illusion of Defeat — W.J. Talbott 153
- Conditional Probability and Defeat — Trenton Merricks 165
- Plantinga, Naturalism, and Defeat — William Alston 176
- Reply to Beilby’s Cohorts — Alvin Plantinga 204
- Contributors 277
- Index 281