Illogic Primer Quotes Clippings Books and Bibliography Paper Trails Links Film

Matthew C. Bagger on Preferring Naturalistic Explanations

Religious Experience, Justification, and History (Cambridge: 1999) p. 13.

We can never assert that, in principle, an event resists naturalistic explanation. A perfectly substantiated, anomalous event, rather than providing evidence for the supernatural, merely calls into question our understanding of particular natural laws. In the modern era, this position fairly accurately represents the educated response to novelty. Rather than invoke the supernatural, we can always adjust our knowledge of the natural in extreme cases. In the modern age in actual inquiry, we never reach the point where we throw up our hands and appeal to divine intervention to explain a localized event like an extraordinary experience.